Formerly DeedShield
Pre-Recording Verification Layer

Pre-Recording Fraud Detection for Title Operations

Trust Signal provides title companies and county recorders with an independent integrity checkpoint before documents enter the public record. Reduce exposure to post-recording fraud, unwind costs, and liability—without replacing existing systems or workflows.

0
Documents Stored
SHA-256
Hash Standard
JWT
Receipt Format
60-Day
Pilot Program

“Fraudsters are stealing land out from under owners… it begins when a real estate agent gets a solicitation from a fake property owner wanting to sell their vacant lot in a rural community… meanwhile, the real property owner has no idea their land has just been sold out from under them.”

— FBI Newark field office press release

The Ministerial Duty Gap

County Recorders operate under ministerial duty: they must record documents that meet formatting and fee requirements, regardless of underlying validity. For title operations, this means no upstream fraud filter before documents enter the public record.

Post-Recording Risk Exposure

Fraudulent deeds using forged notary stamps and fabricated identities can enter public records undetected. For title operations, detection after recording means costly unwinding, legal liability, and disrupted closings.

Rework and Legal Costs

Title companies face direct exposure when fraudulent documents are recorded. Remediation requires quiet title actions often exceeding $10,000 in legal fees, plus operational delays and client relationship damage.

Liability Transfer

Once a fraudulent document is recorded, the burden shifts to title companies and property owners. Without independent verification before recording, proving due diligence becomes significantly harder.

The Cost of Inaction

Quantified risk from authoritative federal data

$1B+

Annual Losses

FBI IC3

According to the FBI's Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3), real estate-related fraud and property scams account for well over $1 billion in reported losses annually in the United States. These losses often surface after transactions are completed and recorded, when investigation and remediation become significantly more costly.

What These Losses Include

Direct Financial Losses

Funds lost to fraudulent transactions, wire fraud, and property theft schemes.

Legal & Investigative Costs

Attorney fees, forensic analysis, and extended litigation to resolve fraudulent claims.

Transaction Delays

Closings halted or reversed, disrupting pipelines and damaging client relationships.

Operational & Reputational Impact

Staff time diverted to remediation, plus long-term trust erosion with clients and partners.

Why These Losses Persist

Recording workflows prioritize processing and storage, not continuous verification

Fraud and anomalies are frequently detected only after recording

Post-recording review often lacks independent integrity signals and audit artifacts

This is a structural visibility gap — not a failure of institutions or professionals.

How It Works

Independent Verification Before Recording

Trust Signal operates as a pre-recording checkpoint for title operations. The system validates document integrity and generates an audit artifact before submission to the recorder—without altering workflows or storing documents.

STEP 01

Document Fingerprinting

Title operations upload the closing deed. Trust Signal generates a cryptographic hash—a unique digital fingerprint—without storing document contents. Privacy is preserved.

STEP 02

Metadata Binding

Key transaction data (jurisdiction, document type, notary ID) is cryptographically bound to the hash, creating an immutable audit reference for pre-recording review.

STEP 03

Integrity Signal

Trust Signal cross-references notary credentials against state registries and validates operator attestations. The output is a PASS or FLAG signal—not a legal determination.

STEP 04

Verification Receipt

A tamper-evident receipt (JWT format) is generated and accompanies the filing. This provides recorders and title agencies with independent, auditable proof of pre-recording review.

Three Value Pillars

Workflow-Level Risk Reduction

For title operations and recording workflows

Trust Signal provides an independent integrity signal before documents are recorded. This enables earlier detection of anomalies and stronger internal documentation—without making legal determinations or replacing existing review processes.

Auditable Due Diligence

Permanent verification records

Every transaction generates a cryptographic verification receipt. This tamper-evident artifact provides title agencies and recorders with permanent, third-party proof of pre-recording review—useful for compliance and liability defense.

Operational Continuity

Integrates with existing systems

Trust Signal is designed as an overlay for title and recording workflows. Integration with SoftPro, ResWare, and major eRecording gateways requires no changes to production software or staff retraining.

What Trust Signal Does Not Do

Does not replace legal review or title insurance

Does not alter or store public records

Final authority remains with recording entity

Trusted Standards & Partners

Simplifile(Integration)
CSC(Integration)
ePN(Integration)
PRIA(Standard)
MISMO(Standard)
ALTA(Standard)

Workflow Overlay

Enhancing SoftPro & ResWare Workflows

“Watch & Verify” without blocking commerce. Deed Shield is deployed as a lightweight API integration or web portal overlay.

  • No "Rip and Replace": Your team continues using SoftPro or ResWare for document creation.
  • The Checkpoint: Before hitting "Submit" to the county, the file is hashed by Trust Signal.
  • A visual "Green Light" allows the recording to proceed.
  • A "Red Flag" pauses the submission for human review, preventing rejection fees and fraud liability.

Built on Zero-Trust Architecture

  • No Document Storage

    We utilize SHA-256 hashing. We see the fingerprint, but never the file. Your client's PII never touches our servers.

  • Tamper-Evident Receipts

    All Verification Receipts are issued as JSON Web Tokens (JWT), cryptographically signed to prevent alteration.

  • Regulatory Alignment

    Compliant with the Illinois Notary Act (Section 176.835) regarding identity proofing and credential analysis.

Frequently Asked Questions

Operational focus questions about Trust Signal implementation

Reduce Post-Recording Risk Before It Enters the Record

We are currently accepting title companies and county recorders for a paid, 60-day pilot program. Assess whether pre-recording verification improves workflow visibility and audit documentation in live operational conditions—with no system replacement required.

60-Day Paid Pilot Program

A focused, time-bound evaluation in real operational conditions

What the Pilot Is

This is a paid, time-boxed, limited-scope evaluation of Trust Signal in live title or recording workflows. The pilot assesses whether pre-recording integrity signals improve workflow visibility, strengthen audit documentation, and fit operationally—without requiring system replacement or long-term commitment.

What Participants Receive

  • Defined pilot scope and technical onboarding session
  • Pre-recording verification signals applied to a limited transaction set
  • Visibility into document integrity, metadata consistency, and flagged anomalies
  • End-of-pilot findings report suitable for internal stakeholder review

What Participants Gain

  • Earlier operational awareness of integrity issues
  • Stronger audit documentation for compliance and liability defense
  • Measurable insight into workflow accuracy and blind spots
  • Evidence-based assessment to inform future fraud mitigation strategy

What the Pilot Does NOT Require

No system replacement
No long-term commitment
No full integration
No public deployment or customer-facing changes

What Happens After 60 Days

Participants may choose to expand, adjust scope, or discontinue based on measured outcomes.

Findings may inform broader deployment, internal process improvements, or fraud mitigation strategy.

No exclusivity, long-term commitment, or follow-on obligation is required or implied.

When post-recording fraud costs exceed $1B annually, pre-recording verification is a measurable operational decision—not a speculative investment.

Paid pilot. Time-boxed scope. No long-term obligation.